WeEU - We europeans is the third Jean Monnet Project designed CesUE ...
AwarEU - European Awareness (Consapevolezza Europea) is a project financed within the Call "Social Inclusion through Education, Training and Youth" of the Key Action 3 Initiatives for Policy Innovation of Erasmus Plus Programof the Key Action 3 Initiatives for Policy Innovation of Erasmus Plus...
CesUE is involved in the call for proposal Jean Monnet Projects 2016 with the EUMAN project addressed to the italian art schools, Licei Artistici, Musicali and Choreutic which aims to transform the European Awareness Days format in a powerful tool of European Civic Education...
EUNews is the second Jean Monnet Project designed CesUE after EUMAN.
With EUNews CesUE launches a TV partnership with the Tuscany regional broadcasting company Granducato TV and...
eCampus telematic University is a young and well-established reality of the Italian academic world that bases its development on the high competence and quality of its teaching staff and its eLearning infrastructure...
EUPath is the Jean Monnet Project 2017 that allows the Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna in Pisa to further develop its European Civic Education initiatives. Designed in tight cooperation with CesUE experts, this project will directly...














EUROPEAN CINEMA EVENTS
The idea that Europe does not represent just a territory, but a community of destiny is quite old.Yet it is just after the two world wars that this idea was implemented through a political project oriented towards European unification. Indeed, after the Second World War, a process of increasing economic and institutional integration starts in Europe.
Individuals – either on their own, or aggregated in groups – continuously take choices. If a constitutionally legitimized government exists, collective choices are delegated to elected representatives, who lead the government on people’s behalf. If a democratic system lacks a binding system of rules through which people might come to collective decisions, some mechanisms of “governance” should be established.
The relationship between individuals and public powers has been changing throughout History. In the last centuries, because of the monopolization of power by national states, individuals have been deemed “subjects”. Subjects are people who, in exchange for the payment of taxes, receive state military and social protection (such as, respectively, public defense, and provision of certain public goods such as schools, health care, and the administration of justice).
Traditionally, Social and Human Sciences have deemed the national state the “natural” key actor of political, economic, cultural, and historical processes. However, because of that, essential aspects of these processes are today ignored or misunderstood. This is why many have criticized such a nationally-based approach. For example, Ranke and Dehio believed that a national history was impossible, given that national and international system evolutions are inextricably linked. In Economics, Robbins criticized those liberals who adopted a national perspective, instead that a global-federalist one. Similarly, Gellner disapproved the use of nationalist approaches within Sociology. In the field of political philosophy, Albertini highlighted the need to overcome the nation-state paradigm. But it was only with Ulrich Beck that this critic has been generalized and popularized through the concept of “methodological nationalism”. He also attempted to develop the idea of “methodological cosmopolitism”; yet this concept is still open.